{"id":158482,"date":"2026-05-04T18:50:52","date_gmt":"2026-05-04T15:50:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cryptonisation.pro\/en\/technical-analysis\/pepe\/"},"modified":"2026-06-04T14:26:48","modified_gmt":"2026-06-04T11:26:48","slug":"pepe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cryptonisation.pro\/en\/cryptocurrency\/trading\/technical-analysis\/pepe\/","title":{"rendered":"PEPE USDT Technical Analysis"},"content":{"rendered":"

In addition to PEPE\u2019s technical analysis, pay special attention to the following metrics:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Whales.<\/span> The top 100 PEPE wallets have been historically controlling up to 90%<\/a> of the total token supply. This means that a few large holders could cause the price to plummet by selling their holdings. <\/li>\n
  2. Holder Count Growth.<\/span> The number of unique wallets holding PEPE is an indicator of interest in the coin. Steady growth in the number of holders (especially small ones) indicates an expansion of the user base and a reduction in dependence on whales. If the number of holders remains flat or declines, this signals waning interest. <\/li>\n
  3. CEX\/DEX Volume Ratio.<\/span> When the majority of trading occurs on CEXs (Binance, OKX, etc.), this indicates widespread interest in the coin. A high share of DEX volume (Uniswap, Cakeswap, etc.) may indicate activity from \u201csmart money\u201d and early adopters. It is characteristic of PEPE that during pumps, up to 80\u201390% of volume shifts to CEX<\/a>. Meanwhile, the return of volume to DEXs often precedes a cooling of interest in the coin.<\/li>\n
  4. Liquidity Pool Depth.<\/span> The TVL in Uniswap pools (PEPE\/WETH pair) indicates how large a trade volume can be executed on the Uniswap exchange without significant slippage. A low TVL indicates that even a relatively small sale can cause a noticeable price drop. The depth of PEPE\u2019s liquidity pools fluctuates significantly: it increases during periods of hype and decreases outside of them. This makes the token\u2019s price extremely sensitive to large transactions.<\/li>\n
  5. Social Media Hype Cycles.<\/span> PEPE is a memecoin, and 70\u201380% of its price is determined by attention on Twitter\/X, Reddit, Telegram, and TikTok. Surges in mentions and memes historically precede price pumps by 1\u20133 days. A decline in social activity is a reliable leading indicator of a correction. Metrics like Social Volume and Social Dominance (from LunarCrush and Santiment) are the main tracking tools.<\/li>\n
  6. Memecoin Season Correlation.<\/span> PEPE does not move on its own\u2014it correlates strongly with the overall sentiment in the memecoin sector (DOGE, SHIB, FLOKI, WIF). When money flows into memecoins, PEPE is one of the first to see a price increase. The reverse flow of capital (memes \u2192 DeFi\/AI) drives the coin\u2019s price down.<\/li>\n
  7. Token Burn Mechanism.<\/span> PEPE has no built-in automatic coin burn mechanism, and any announcements of new burns are received extremely positively by the market.<\/li>\n
  8. ETH & BTC Correlation.<\/span> PEPE is an ERC-20 token and is strongly tied to the state of Ethereum. High fees on ETH can reduce activity among small PEPE traders, and a drop in ETH drags down the entire ERC-20 sector. PEPE also reacts strongly to changes in the price of BTC: in a falling market, memecoins suffer much more than other sectors, losing up to 80\u201395% from their peaks. In a rising market, on the contrary, they grow faster on average than coins from other sectors.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    In addition to PEPE\u2019s technical analysis, pay special attention to the following metrics: Whales. The top 100 PEPE wallets have been historically controlling up to 90% of the total token supply. This means that a few large holders could cause the price to plummet by selling their holdings. Holder Count Growth. The number of unique […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":93,"featured_media":0,"parent":158459,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"template-ta-coin.php","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-158482","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-analysis-technical"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cryptonisation.pro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158482","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cryptonisation.pro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cryptonisation.pro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonisation.pro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/93"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonisation.pro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=158482"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonisation.pro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158482\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":158723,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonisation.pro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158482\/revisions\/158723"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonisation.pro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158459"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cryptonisation.pro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=158482"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonisation.pro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=158482"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cryptonisation.pro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=158482"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}